Отзывы Whiskybase
учтено 91 заметок · текстовых 55 · полный lossless-снимок WB (полнота подтверждена)
Суммаризация отзывов
Ben Nevis 10-year-old — характерный «фанковый» и олдскульный виски с солодово-восковым и фруктовым профилем, но отзывы сильно расходятся: от восхищения до критики за молодость, простоту и непостоянство. Часть отмечает падение качества и слабое соотношение цены и содержания.
развернуть подробно
Разбор отзывов показывает сходство в описании характерного «фанкового», спиртового и необычного профиля. Его называют чистым и солодовым, «олдскульным», восковым, с тропическими и orchard-фруктами (груша, айва, виноград, яблоко), металлом, дымом, травянистостью, сеном, мёдом и минеральными нотами; отмечают также сладость, хорошо сбалансированную фруктовость, цветочные и цитрусовые оттенки и меньшую роль бочки и хереса по сравнению с прежними версиями. В ряде отзывов ему нужно время в бокале. Отдельно упоминается яркий профиль тёмного шоколада, кофе, апельсиновой корки и кожи с балансом сухости и сладости, а один отзыв говорит о крайней нестабильности впечатления от бутылки со временем.
При этом мнения прямо расходятся. Одни считают виски выдающимся, недооценённым и рекомендуют его; другие называют его прямолинейным, простым, «жёстким и сырым», «заурядным» и «ничего особенного», указывая на спиртуозность, молодость, слабую середину, тонкое тело, сухость, горечь и короткий вкус (иногда при длинном послевкусии). Также встречаются критика за «плоскость» и водянистость, недостаток полноценной выдержки, ощущение молодости (6–7 лет) и спешности, лёгкий текильный оттенок, резко отрицательное сравнение с молодым спиртом, проблемы с партиями и непостоянство, а также указания на изменение профиля, падение качества по сравнению с более старыми партиями и менее заметное влияние шери. Часть отзывов считает виски слишком дорогим за то, что он предлагает и неспектакулярным с коротким финишем, тогда как другие хвалят простую, но качественную и «прямолинейную» подачу.
собрано 55/91 текстовых отзывов · полный lossless-снимок WB
· 2026-10-08T05:29:14Z · источник evidence
A strange malt, the most exciting thing here is the very idiosyncratic nose. Overall, I barely detect any additive cask aromas; not fizzy but spirit-driven, and not very complex. Not a bad malt, but definitely not for everyone. It's interesting to have it in my glass; I'm also curious to see what happens as the bottle fills down. Based on my current impressions, though, I probably won't be putting it on my shelf anytime soon, which is a shame...
I've tried several versions of the 1996 Benny, and to be honest, this 2021 version really does have that old flavor. When I first tasted it, I even wondered if I was just in a really good mood that day. Actually, no. That day I was preparing the final accounts report. I work until 11 o'clock every day and I'm exhausted. The scent also has a very old feel to it, very similar to the Benny perfumes from 1996 to me. The initial taste is slightly waxy, followed by tropical fruit flavors, which I found to be very full-bodied, very similar to both the one from Dengyun Valley and the one from Vintage Bottler. The middle and later sections are slightly worse. For me, it's like, "Holy crap, holy crap, huh?" It's a little rough, but the overall experience is definitely not comparable to other 10-year or no-year models. In short, if I had to buy a basic model for around 700 yuan, I would choose Benedict without hesitation. Of course, if the 2012 Hakushu was cheaper, I might buy Hakushu (I really like the grass flavor). I also don't like overly sweet or cloyingly sweet flavors. Overall, it's awesome and highly recommended. Those of you who gave low ratings, what kind of idiots are you?
It's well done, the profile is nice although quite austere.
нос 86 · вкус 85 · финиш 85
Nose : a bit dry. Cocoa powder, hazelnuts and smoke. A bit later some fruits are comming. As time goes by, fruits getting more lively . Plate : nice, but this is 10yeras old, not like some other older batches with some older casks inside. A bit oily, spicy, smoky with fruits and dryness saying hello as well (imagine hazelnut shell and wood). Very easy to finish your dram, so be careful, it's a bit dangerous. Has no big body like some older version but it's still a very good 10years old highland malt with his own character.
Very pure and malty. Def. Less cask and especially sherry influence compared to the previous version(s).
нос 87 · вкус 86 · финиш 86
Aroma Spicy, acid, nut, vanilla taste Light fruity, spicy, herbs, chili catcher, sweet finish Medium length, spicy, sweetish, somewhat watery
нос 85 · вкус 86 · финиш 87
Very nice and palatable.
A very well balanced single malt, very reminiscent of the Springbank 10 in my opinion. It has that industrial thing about it alongside just a light touch of funk which elevates this further. Very good. Value (£50) : 8/10
нос 87 · вкус 86 · финиш 87
нос 85 · вкус 86 · финиш 85
нос 85 · вкус 85 · финиш 84
Rough, spicy, raw, I want to love this, but it is hard
Campbeltown and more, entry-level: 2022.10.28. https://www.whiskybase.com/whiskies/whisky/67261/glencadam-15-year-old 87- https://www.whiskybase.com/whiskies/whisky/189581/ben-nevis-10-year-old 86+ https://www.whiskybase.com/whiskies/whisky/205096/campbeltown-loch-blended-malt-scotch-whisky 84- https://www.whiskybase.com/whiskies/whisky/165224/kilkerran-12-year-old 85+ https://www.whiskybase.com/whiskies/whisky/192398/kilkerran-16-year-old 87- https://www.whiskybase.com/whiskies/whisky/197550/hazelburn-10-year-old 88- https://www.whiskybase.com/whiskies/whisky/6297/springbank-cv 84+ https://www.whiskybase.com/whiskies/whisky/180670/springbank-10-year-old 88-
нос 85 · вкус 87 · финиш 87
Phew. I used to like Ben Nevis, but they're not exactly tempting me. The Coire Leis is simply still very young. But even the 10-year-old is a pretty straightforward, clean Highland malt compared to the old days. It's good, though. But it's good by the 10-year Highland standard. So, 35 to 40 euros. The Core Leis isn't bad in its youth and, at 46%, would be an alternative for a good 30 euros. Of course, I'm rating it without considering the price. But it still has to be said: they're both far too expensive for what they offer.
нос 84 · вкус 85 · финиш 84
This is no longer the same Ben Nevis 10 that we knew 5 years ago, but the character and sulfur-metallurgical style of the distillery's DNA has been preserved. They give out a very weak quality, but a very long aftertaste, as well as a short taste. In general, it’s interesting, the aftertaste seems to steal the taste. What’s interesting is that due to their youth it is absolutely impossible to determine the composition of the barrels in the blend. The fact that there are bourbon barrels here is understandable, but are there sherry barrels?) As if the sulfur content should be responsible for them, but it could also be DNA. 21.5 21.5 20 20
It’s got a slightly "old-school" feel, which I love. However, consistency can be an issue, and the distribution is all over the place—sometimes it’s easy to find, sometimes it disappears for months.
Tasted from a 5cl sample from a friend´s bottle. Really interesting, different and full of funk. Just the second Nevis I try after a 4yo heavily peated from the 100 proof SV series. I need a full bottle, it has a lot of potential. Bravo Ben Nevis, bravo!!
Doing a back to back with The original 10 yo, signatory 100 10yo proof JE 10 yo and MOS 1996 16 yo. The 10 OB for me is the most enjoyable and delicious malt of all. I believe there are quality issues in a few batches however must have got lucky with this batch. Not an easy whisky, quite funky and unique, but that’s the trend to love or hate it. This one gets my top vote as it retains the funky, oily character the most. A unique and quality whisky.
нос · вкус · финиш
| Нос | 85 | Herbal, dried fruits, petroleum, gummy in a nice way. Toffee. |
| Вкус | 87 | Creamy, dry, dark honey and chocolate, peppery, minerals, petroleum, machine oil, lapsang tea, oily texture, burnt orange.Grassy funky notes. |
| Финиш | 86 | Medium to long, orange, toffee, creamy, slightly bitter. |
Absolutely brilliant. There's diesel and chocolate and vinegar and melon and citrus and Juicyfruit chewing gum and flowers and caramel and lychee and chilli powder and creamy vanilla and leather and the merest trace of peat, and it all somehow works! A smidge of water doesn't make it better or worse, it just brings out new flavours and subdues others.
нос 89 · вкус 90 · финиш 89
Ben Nevis 10yo 46% (Old) [WB: 177882] vs. Ben Nevis 10yo 46% (New) [WB: 189581] So the two are different in color. Also in the nose a clear difference. Old Nevis is not only darker visually, but also in the nose and mouth. The old 10 just looks fuller and richer. While one could blindly appreciate the old bottling a little older, the new bottling is definitely believed to be 10 years old. The wood notes are also tart, stronger and more mature in the old Nevis. In comparison, the new bottling still looks quite youthful and sparkling. I think it's nice that the new one still has the Nevis distillery character. Overall, the old 10 clearly won for me. You can drink the new bottling quite well, but for me it is not a purchase candidate. Especially with the currently called prices of around 80 €.
Ben Nevis Session https://www.whiskybase.com/whiskies/whisky/161626/ben-nevis-macdonalds-traditional 85- https://www.whiskybase.com/whiskies/whisky/189581/ben-nevis-10-year-old 87- https://www.whiskybase.com/whiskies/whisky/199690/ben-nevis-2008-ba 86+ https://www.whiskybase.com/whiskies/whisky/99426/ben-nevis-1996-dl 88- https://www.whiskybase.com/whiskies/whisky/170977/ben-nevis-batch-7-tbwc 91- https://www.whiskybase.com/whiskies/whisky/134068/ben-nevis-1991-sv 91+
нос 87 · вкус 88 · финиш 87
нос · вкус · финиш
| Нос | 91 | Absolutely typical Ben Nevis full of old-fashioned aromas, early fruity tones, chalk, waxy accents, metal, light flowers and a biscuit-like maltiness. Overall very dense and creamy and really uplifting / dramturgically composed! Really great! With water: lots of tropical fruits, heavy flowers, citrus zest, wax, metal and malt. Still incredibly dense and wonderfully structured. |
| Вкус | 90 | Fat, waxy, full of zesty citrus notes, earth, lime, metal, furniture polish, old coins, tropical fruits and a hint of smoke. Dark chocolate and herbaceous reflexes in the background. Top! With water: zestier, maltier, full of wax and old coins...really old-school. |
| Финиш | 88 | Long, fat, waxy, lemony, herbaceous and slightly earthy. |
нос 87 · вкус 88 · финиш 88
нос 85 · вкус 84 · финиш 83
Early first impressions - a little more orchard fruit and a little less funk than the recently discontinued edition of the 10 year old (with the previous packaging), along with a muesli mix of honey, nuts and raisins. Perhaps also a hint less creamy density and a little more bright orange oils. Quality still very high, and reassuringly still the Ben Nevis orchestra, just a tweak to the key and the arrangement of the instruments.
This is still a great 10yo, A little bit more bitter, citrusy then the last label 10yo. I need to find another bottle mine is 1/2 gone already .This has to be the best 10yo around atm, If you can find it
The acidity of sour yogurt and the character of sherry from fresh to fresh are interesting. It has a low ripeness, so you can feel the spirit power.
нос 82 · вкус 85 · финиш 86
Ralfy review 928: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CLkDOxa--Wk (73/100). "Oh, that's young. Very distinctive notes of well-rounded new make spirit. ... Reminds me little bit of some lightly rested tequilas." vs 89/100 from Angus @ Whiskyfun.com: http://www.whiskyfun.com/archiveseptember21-2-Glenlivet-Bladnoch.html#180921
нос · вкус · финиш
| Нос | 88 | malty, and pleasantly sweet |
| Вкус | 88 | round, tasty, hints of sherry & rum, somewhat edgy |
| Финиш | 87 | pleasant, becoming dry towards the end Conclusion: Pleasant and drinkable whisky, but I miss the distinctive. Where is your character? |
Notes from whiskyfun.com: Ben Nevis 10 yo (46%, OB, 2021) A tasteful and confident looking re-branding if you ask me. I always think lots of blank space is rather cool and powerful on a label. Although, it does look quite 'Japanese', if I may say so… Colour: straw. Nose: impressively, and immediately, 'old school'. Lots of chalk, waxes, plaster, limestone and white flowers. Feels closer to these late 90s batches in profile than some of the sweeter recent batches. Goes on with some lemon peel, waxy citrons, hay, and barley water. Wonderfully natural and, if I may say so, uncommercial. Mouth: lovely fat and waxy arrival, lots of olive oil, light ointments, natural barley derived sweetness and encroaching exotic fruits ala the 1996s. Wonderful texture in the mouth and 'presence', makes you wonder if they haven't added one or two older casks to the mix? Finish: good length, oiliness, malt extract, waxes, citrus oils, very lightly medicinal and gently herbal. Comments: I dread to think how many far, far more expensive whiskies would be unceremoniously slaughtered by this and Springbank 10yo. This is charming, hugely characterful, precise, distinctive, extremely well balanced and, most importantly, totally delicious. Someone dangerously clever was behind this… SGP: 562 - 89 points. https://www.whiskyfun.com/archiveseptember21-2-Glenlivet-Bladnoch.html#180921
нос 87 · вкус 88 · финиш 86
Spirity, simple, citrus, green herbs, tropical fruit
нос 86 · вкус 85 · финиш 85
Sweet and well balanced, relatively cheap, and still affordable. I hope the price doesn't rise due to a certain French man's influence.
нос 88 · вкус 87 · финиш 86
Great, very fruity, light smoke, great balance. For Fridays
нос · вкус · финиш
| Нос | 88 | Creamy vanilla, desert dough, sour ripe pear, and very light fruity smoke |
| Вкус | 89 | Creamy sweet slight sour juicy pear, lemon peel oil with light peaty floral smoke |
| Финиш | 88 | Medium, floral smoke, very fruity, vanilla |
(Update Dec. 22: I can give the whisky two more points today, after I've had it in the glass several times and allowed myself a lot of air. I think 90 euros is too steep, but it's a very good 10yo 46% whisky a year 2022. But unfortunately that is relative and shows where the bar is today Today I find subtle tartaric acid in the background, which disappears when the whisky breathes for ten minutes. I still think that the Ben Nevis 10 is one of the whiskys that has changed the least in profile, but unfortunately it cannot deny the difference in quality to the 2001 Ben Nevis 10. With a lot of air I upgrade it by one point today and in terms of taste and finish it has also deteriorated slightly, but it is still noticeable and has become a bit thinner. If the old bottling is available for 20 euros more, then that's two points more for a whisky that is between 86.5 and 89 points. For me it's a world). This is not a whisky for the blender glass, because there a clear New Make note is too present. In the Glencairn glass it appears much more voluminous and offers more aromas. All in all an average, but exciting Highland whisky, which already has its own character for the key data. However, that is to be expected given the high price. However, I don't need a bottle of this as it's not the flavor profile I like, as I only like those grassy flavors in mature and oily whiskys.
нос · вкус · финиш
| Нос | 87 | (Update Dec. 22: Today the whisky looks very Ben Nevis like, but everything in thin or light. Nice and good Ben Nevis aromas, but unfortunately without heart or intensity.) Almost 88, more like 87.5 points. In contrast to the Blenders, there is a slight peat-sulphur note here, which is not there in the Blenders glass. I wouldn't call the whisky smoky though. Behind it, the whisky also appears darker than in Blenders. A sweetness of wildflower honey and hazelnut liqueur is present in the middle. The grassy citrus notes from the beginning are always present and often gain the upper hand. Orange peels can also be found in this colourful, not always perfectly balanced mix of aromas. |
| Вкус | 86 | 86.5 On the palate again a grassy citrus note and relatively subtle sweetness and a dry, tart spiciness. Unfortunately, it's not quite my cup of tea and overall it still seems relatively young and, despite the drinking strength, a bit too alcoholic, too mineral and not round. |
| Финиш | 86 | The mouthfeel is not oily and, like the palate, is comparatively harsh and dry for the 46 percent. |
Tasted on 11-26-2022. 86-87
Very simple malt, not unpleasant but nothing special either
нос · вкус · финиш
| Нос | 84 | Barley malt, citrus fruits, spices, nutmeg, apple peel, grapefruit |
| Вкус | 82 | barley malt, spices, oak; creamy |
| Финиш | 80 | bitterness, citrus |
нос 87 · вкус 86 · финиш 86
It needs time in the glass / 15 min +
нос 86 · вкус 87 · финиш 88
I absolutely agree with LDB. I actually have hazelnut cream and a bit of caramel on my nose. Somehow cool. A stable malt on the palate and finish, but the nose really deserves a plus point in terms of attention. Good PLV.
нос 87 · вкус 86 · финиш 86
A drink to serve to visitors - you don't have to rink it and they may take the hint and not come again...alright, but underwhelming.
нос · вкус · финиш
| Нос | 83 | Sour apples, weetabix and a dash of nail varnish. |
| Вкус | 80 | Difficult to describe - quite a thick mouthfeel, faint trace of apple, weak spice, slightly anonymous. |
| Финиш | 79 | Fairly short and a little flat. |
Compared to the previous batches indeed a little rougher and more citrus notes. The spirit shines through a little more and the fruitiness make it a rather fresh edition of the ten. Same score as the last batch before with the old livery. For some reason hard to obtain, which is a shame.
Still a good dram, good to have it back but not on par with the 10y I fell in love with a decade ago
нос 83 · вкус 85 · финиш 84
нос 84 · вкус 85 · финиш 84
нос 87 · вкус 86 · финиш 85
нос 86 · вкус 86 · финиш 85
Sweet whisky with a dry aftertaste, hints of vanilla/oak and honey
Light, straw color. Quite oily structure.
нос · вкус · финиш
| Нос | 87 | At first, quite dry. Peculiar. A bit chemical. Varnishes. Then sweeter aromas come in. Caramel, honey and vanilla. Floral. A meadow with blooming flowers on it. Then floral aromas. Then orchard fruit. Green apples. A bit of spice. After a while, alcohol is slightly noticeable. Citrus. Mandarin. Wax. On the second nose, a lot of yeast dough comes in. |
| Вкус | 84 | Varnishes. Dry. Chemical. Old barrel. A bit of spice. A trace of ginger. Minerality. Salt. Wax. A trace of ash. A lot of salt. Slight oiliness. |
| Финиш | 85 | A pinch of spice. Pickled ginger. Quite dry. Old barrel. A touch of caramel, less sweet. White pepper. Traces of vanilla, again less sweet. Grapefruit peel. Albedo. Minerality. A trace of ash after the second sip. Quite a long finish. |
нос 84 · вкус 86 · финиш 85
C'mon, S.V. gave it an 89 'cos it's only 46%Vol, but let's be franc, it's just the perfect sipping strength when it's this delicious. It's a 90, and y'll know it...
нос 89 · вкус 87 · финиш 84
Ideal-price
нос 87 · вкус 86 · финиш 86
The world doesn't need it.
нос · вкус · финиш
| Нос | 81 | herbs, fruit (pear), wood |
| Вкус | 78 | Fresh wood, briefly vanilla, herbal chemistry, tart |
| Финиш | 75 | medium long, bitter |
Nice blend of light floral and waxy notes, and the dirty earthy/leafy notes I get in most Ben Nevis expressions so far.
нос · вкус · финиш
| Нос | 86 | Floral, grass, wax, honey, vanilla, light fruit. |
| Вкус | 85 | Fruity, fresh, a dirty earthy note, tomato, some dark bitter chocolate. |
| Финиш | 84 | Medium, fruity and bitter leafy notes. |
нос 88 · вкус 89 · финиш 86
Ben Nevis 10 Year Old Official Release, 46%. 25ml sample, presumably from a very recent bottling, consumed at home Feb 2025. Pale golden. Aroma has peach and apricot esters – fruity in an almost new-makey sort of way, some butter and chalk, slightly burnt wax. Body is watery. Taste again has a lot of fruit notes – ‘waxy’ fruits almost like marzipan fruits, maybe underripe pineapple that morphs into apple, also quite meaty, salty suggesting a hint of peat. The finish is a bit waxy and astringent but never gets too much over the course of 25ml. Rounded and characterful on the palate. The aroma is okay but quite youthful-seeming and the spirit character I’ve seen in independent bottlings doesn’t come across. I do get the distillery character on the palate though. The consensus online seems to be that the quality of this bottling has fallen dram-atically recently. I don’t have the experience to comment on that, but this is still a really good whisky in my book. The flavour notes I’m getting are miles away from what I’ve read from others, suggesting that (in agreement with some of the commentary I’ve seen) that there is now much less sherry cask influence in this than there used to be. Very good stuff in any case. 3.6/86
Nose: Honey, lemons, bread crust, vanilla, light smoke, unripe wild strawberries and raspberries. Very fresh and sweet. Taste: Grass, orange peel, lots of caramel, chamomile, buttered toast. Finish: Medium-long. Ginger, pepper, vanilla, caramel, pudding, buttered toast, caramels.
Somewhat strange Nevis. Definitely with older components, but it doesn't quite work for me.
нос · вкус · финиш
| Нос | 86 | Smells like.... hazelnut liqueur, Caramac bars, and after a while subtle fruitiness comes with elderberry. Oily impression, slight note of glue. |
| Вкус | 86 | A wave of elderflower syrup arrives, but then quickly Grandma's kitchen cupboard with a mixture of fondor, old oil and meat broth. Everything is very balanced and smooth. |
| Финиш | 85 | It quickly turns a bit woody, which is a shame as the tannins come through a bit too clearly. |
Look nice 10s. Comes close to the 2017 bottling, just has a little less ... character. I like it very much.
нос 88 · вкус 89 · финиш 87
нос 84 · вкус 83 · финиш 82
нос 86 · вкус 85 · финиш 86
нос 81 · вкус 74 · финиш 74
нос 87 · вкус 87 · финиш 86
Color: gold Good, robust, complex, not banal but at the same time very pleasant.
just normal. not a special.
This is the best expression of the chocolate/coffee/orange/leather profile I've had to date. It is present at every stage and is ruthlessly effective and enjoyable as it surfaces and sinks repeatedly throughout the other present flavours. Clear sweetness and dryness without it being too sweet or too dry. Despite being 5.4% lower ABV than NWFTB this is hotter than I anticipated from the nose and just in general. It all works in the mix, though. Whereas I wouldn't say that the whisky that contains this is "watered down", I will say that Ben Nevis is tangibly the backbone, providing much of the character and sequential narrative that I recognised. *Edit - I finished this bottle recently, and I felt like I should revisit this review with my thoughts. As you can tell, I was a big fan of this bottle when I first got into it. However, it has been the most inconsistent whisky drinking experience of my life. I went right off it for quite a while, finding that it had gone flat with the life seemly washed out of it, but my last sips were again, really enjoyable. With the extra experience under my belt I'm going to knock this down a few notches.
нос · вкус · финиш
| Нос | 89 | Immediately there is a warm and deeply charismatic announcement of rich, dark chocolate covered coffee beans, orange oil and new leather. Some prunes, and rum raisin are also billed, but take a back seat, content in their complimentary roles. Further supporting cast members include delicate vanilla wafer, foreshadowing allspice and a non-speaking part for liquorice root. |
| Вкус | 89 | As the curtain rises, stagehands of confectionery sugar and limoncello fumes can briefly be glimpsed, clearing the stage for the arrival of a dry but crema-creamy opening monologue of further desiccated fruits, with a mildly tropical accent. The headline mocha, orange oil and leather trio step forward into the spotlight, their harmony and presence now fully illuminated, only for a sudden scene change of ginger rising through dry ice, heralding a plot twist lead by a gloriously mutinous trio of black and white pepper and allspice. |
| Финиш | 88 | Continuing without an interval, the theatrical spice threesome heatedly battle for supremacy, both peppers quickly succumbing and repositioning themselves with ginger as loudly humming background singers. Once again chocolate coffee, orange and leather step forward to deliver a touching finale and then, as they take a bow sasparilla and cola nut try to sneak on stage for autographs. |
нос 86 · вкус 86 · финиш 85
нос 88 · вкус 88 · финиш 87
A lighter version of Ben Nevis compared to the previous 10YO. Grassier, fruitier and a lot of floral notes.
нос 87 · вкус 86 · финиш 85
нос 87 · вкус 84 · финиш 85
Nose: aromatic, orchard (pear, quince, grapes, apple), hay, floral, some blossom honey, some mineral notes, musty note Palate: rather flat and watery, mineral, orchard (as above), hay, some blossom honey, slightly musty Finish: short to medium-long, somewhat snappy and sour, mineral notes, pear, quince, some blossom honey Rating: not the real thing. It's a shame, that used to be one of my favorite standards, but this one doesn't pick me up (anymore?). To me it seems rather flat, half-baked and unspectacular. One less classic. 83/100 or 5/10
So much more potential from this spirit than this. Really feels like a rush job and/or a lack of proper cask maturation.
нос · вкус · финиш
| Нос | 83 | Porridge, hint of bbq smoke, ripe pears, quinces, minerals (in particular iron). The basics of the spirit are definitely promising, but it does not smell like a 10-year-old, rather 6-7 years. The alcohol is not completely integrated and is rather stingy. After a while faint notes of wood appear. |
| Вкус | 82 | Here the lack of proper wood maturation comes much more to the foreground. A wave of alcohol, followed by lemon and lime, green grapes, minerals, and a slightly sweeter site (nectarines, pears). |
| Финиш | 84 | Decent length with minerals, fresh green fruits (grapes, apples, pears) and again the minerals (calcium, iron). |
A nose that has some similarities with that of Coire Leis, but more focused on dates, exotic fruits and chocolate. Coffee, varnished wood and dried fruit. Beeswax, a hint of smoke, we find the particular character of the distillery, but in a less significant way. On the palate, it's honeyed, slightly lemony and sparkling, with easy-drinking spices, notes of dried banana and chicory, a little dry at the end. Long finish, on heather, chocolate cake, undergrowth, humus, fermented grapes. For me, who loved the 2016 edition, it's a disappointment. We have the impression that it is younger, more diluted, even if it is not. https://ilikesky2020.blogspot.com/2023/10/ben-nevis-10-yo-2021.html
нос 87 · вкус 85 · финиш 88
нос 86 · вкус 85 · финиш 85
The nose is great, very waxy and fruity, the palate adds dry white wine and lots of mineral notes. The finish is short and waxy. It’s not very complex but what it does it does very well. The surprise to me is how straightforward of a dram this is, it never goes off piste. If you like the wacky side of Ben Nevis this may disappoint you, but to me this is a success.
нос 86 · вкус 85 · финиш 85
S 7 Clean & easy, not complex but professionally crafted. A rather smooth one judging from the nose. Will take a blender's glass to get more notes from it. [78-82] Good buy when I've extra money to spend, most whisky stays within this band. N 25 First off a clean, young, refreshing sandalwood aroma. Then a handful of fresh citric fruit. Some new make sweetness. Touch of toffee malt developing. Baselined by spices (white pepper, nutmeg) P 25 Very fruity (stone fruit), barley sugar. Oaky & malty. Slowly getting some new leather notes. Then oak spices & refreshing menthol arrive at the end. F 3 Short finish. All spices. A bit dry at the edge. Subtlely fruity in the background.
нос 86 · вкус 85 · финиш 84